Importing 3rd World People Will Result In 3rd World Problems 0 Immigration without integration is an invasion. As of now, more than half the nation’s governors, ranging from Alabama and Georgia to Michigan and Illinois, have publicly spoken out against taking in an influx of Syrian refugees until security concerns are addressed. The left-wing advocates welcoming Syrian refugees with open arms have resorted to their well-documented tactics of labeling all who oppose the plan “ideological extremists”, “spewers of hateful rhetoric”, etc. Sadly for the left, their imaginary world of religious harmony is disconnected and does not exist. There is more than enough evidence that terrorists can and will blend in with Syrian refugees. How? At least one of the terrorists involved in last Friday’s terrorist attack in Paris claiming the lives of 132 is believed to have entered mainland Europe by boat through Leros, Greece, like many other Syrian refugees fleeing the civil war. Why is it that under no obligation, the Obama administration is so committed to accepting 10,000+ refugees in 2016 and even more in 2017? Are there communities here that are willing to resettle them? No. Do we have access to Syrian records to carefully vet backgrounds of would-be refugees? No. Are the wealthiest Muslim countries (Saudi Arabia, UAE, Qatar, Kuwait) taking in Syrian refugees? Absolutely not. The endgame for the Obama administration is clear as day. By bypassing the demands of the nation’s state governments and alleviating Syrian refugee trauma with a life full of entitlement programs and special treatment, new refugees will live like current U.S. Middle Eastern refugees in the U.S. right now. As data from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Refugee Resettlement shows, 91.4% of Middle Eastern refugees in the U.S. are currently on Food Stamps, 19.7% reside in Public Housing, and 68.3% receive Cash Welfare. Government dependency is after all, what drives voters to the polls in overwhelming numbers to support Democratic candidates. But this isn’t even the tip of the iceberg. Domestic terrorism is a serious threat to America in the 21st Century, and Obama’s soft spot for Islam isn’t going to help. How is it that a religion so fundamentally incompatible with leftist values is so protected and praised by Obama and the left? On the outside, this romance seems rather puzzling. The fact of the matter is that President Obama is an anti-colonist who simply couldn’t care less about the safety of the American people or the American homeland that he swore under oath to defend against all enemies, foreign and domestic. In his two terms in office, Obama has been opposed to defending religious liberty here at home and to condemn terrorism against our closest allies.